TLC Faculty members Eddie Schmidt (Nashville,TN) and Ann Johnson (Houston, TX) recently sued the school system for violation of Title IX, which prohibits sexual harassment of students. The plaintiffs claimed that school officials had actual knowledge of the harassment and acted with deliberate indifference by failing to institute an appropriate disciplinary response.
The jury found the school board responsible and awarded $100,000 to each student.
Here is a summary of the Case:
TRIAL NEWS
Verdicts & Settlements: Schools
August 4, 2011
School district fails to respond to students' sexual harassment
TRIAL NEWS
Verdicts & Settlements: Schools
August 4, 2011
School district fails to respond to students' sexual harassment
While
on their middle-school basketball team, 12-year-old seventh graders Doe and Roe
were sexually harassed by four eighth-grade teammates in the school locker
room. On one occasion, three of the eighth graders grabbed Doe and held him
down, while the fourth removed Doe’s shorts and attempted to sodomize him with
a marker. On other occasions, the eighth graders subjected Doe and Roe to
“lights out” sessions in which the older boys blocked the door, turned off the
lights, and simulated sexual gyrations on the younger boys. Another time, one
of the eighth graders attempted to pull down Roe’s shorts. On yet another
occasion, the eighth-grade students taunted Roe into doing a sit-up while
blindfolded and, and he was trying to sit up, one of the students dropped his
pants and placed his naked buttocks in Roe’s face.
Although
the coach allegedly became aware of the attempted sodomy incident within days,
he failed to immediately report it or discipline the offending students. After
learning of the incident, Doe’s mother went to the school principal, who denied
knowledge of it. Doe’s mother then received a call from the coach apologizing
for the incident. The four students involved were subsequently suspended for 10
days, and Doe’s father and Roe’s mother, together with another parent, met with
the superintendent and notified her of additional incidents of
student-on-student harassment and bullying that had occurred in the boys’
locker room. Roe’s mother also advised the principal and superintendent that
other students were threatening her son to keep quiet about the incidents.
When
the threats and intimidation continued, Roe’s mother removed him from the
school. About a week later, the school’s disciplinary board voted to terminate
the disciplinary action against the four suspended students and reinstate them
to the basketball team. The following month, Doe’s mother removed him from the
school, fearing for his safety.
Both
boys suffered emotional distress and severe humiliation.
Doe’s
and Roe’s parents sued the school system for violation of Title IX, which
prohibits sexual harassment of students. The plaintiffs claimed that school
officials had actual knowledge of the harassment and acted with deliberate
indifference by failing to institute an appropriate disciplinary response.
The
jury found the school board responsible and awarded $100,000 to each student.
The plaintiffs anticipate posttrial motions.
Citation: Mathis v. Wayne Co., No.
1:09-cv-0034 (M.D. Tenn. June 9, 2011).
Plaintiff counsel: AAJ
member Edmund J. Schmidt, Nashville, and Ann Johnson, Houston.
Plaintiff expert: Carole de
Casal, school administration, Nashville.
No comments:
Post a Comment